Agenda and Presentations
S3 Targeted Support – Open data & Open Science for S3 monitoring
2nd July 2019
Generalitat de Catalunya
Carrer Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 639
Barcelona
1st July 2019
20:30-22:00 Networking dinner (XUP XUP Restaurant -Paseo Marítimo de la Barceloneta, s/n)
2nd July 2019
08:45 - 09:00 Welcome Coffee and registration
|
09:00 – 09:15 – Introduction to the day
Mark Boden (JRC): Opening remarks
Elisabetta Marinelli (JRC): Introduction to the day
|
09:15-10:15 Open Data and S3 Monitoring – New cases, new issues
Nicola de Chiara (Agid, Agenzia per l’Italia digitale): The ONCE observatory (20 mins)
Ismael Rafols (Ingenio, Spain): On the potential effects of monitoring systems in STI policy (20 mins)
Q&A (20 mins)
|
10:15- 11:30 Participatory exercise – part 1
- Country-specific issues in open data for monitoring
Country-Specific table discussions:
With the help of the moderator the working tables will discuss the following aspects, based on the exercises just conducted.
- For each data-source
- Potential for S3 analysis and monitoring
- Main obstacles encountered to access / analyse the data source
Accessing the data
Managing / analysing the data
- Data granularity requirements
- Data openness
Timely
Accessible / Machine processable / Interoperable
Findable
Licensed
- Potential improvements and paths forward (e.g. Best practice exchanges between administrations and data platforms // Useful dimensions/data currently not accessible that could be made public)
- choose the best example to report exercise 2
Country
|
Moderator
|
Spain
|
Ana Fernandez
|
Italy
|
Elisabetta Marinelli
|
Greece
|
Michalis Metaxas
|
Portugal
|
Hugo Pinto
|
Romania
|
Petra Szávics/Participant
|
Bulgaria, Croatia and Hungary
|
Lajos Nyiri
|
|
11:30 - 12:00 Coffee Break
|
12:00 -13:00 Participatory exercise – part 2
3 working groups will be organised, ensuring a good representation of different countries.
- Peer sharing - short oral presentation of 2-3 best practices (by the moderator/rapporteur)
- Comments on the two EU-level initiatives (relevance for S3 monitoring and data openness)
- (If there is time) Discussion on the potential effects of monitoring systems in STI policy
|
Moderator
|
Rapporteurs
|
Group 1
|
Yannis Tolias
|
Hugo Pinto,
|
Group 2
|
Elisabetta Marinelli
|
Michalis Metaxas
|
Group 3
|
Mathieu Doussineau
|
Petra Szavics
|
|
13:00 - 13:30 Reporting back and discussion
- All the rapporteurs of the different groups report back to open-up a discussion
|
13:30 - 13:40 Proposal from our Critical Friend Attila Varga: Seeking for regions to pilot S3 evaluation.
|
13:40 – 14:30 Lunch break
|
14:30 – 15:15 Real-life experiences with S3 evaluation
|
15:15 – 16:00
- Commenting examples of S3 mid-term evaluation ToRs
ToR elements: Are the following aspects clear? Are they appropriate?
- General information:
- the background, rationale and objectives of the policy to be evaluated, its target recipients, delivery method and intended outcomes;
- the audience and intended use of the evaluation;
- Technical information:
- the extent of the existing evidence base related to the policy;
- the evaluation objectives and research questions;
- the possible evaluation approach, research design and methods;
- the required capabilities, skills and experience of the proposed evaluation and team;
- Outputs and deliverables
- the required evaluation outputs (including datasets) and the milestones to be met;
- data archiving requirements;
- Organisational and Economic information
- the indicative budget;
- the evaluation timetable
Conceptual reflections:
- OP vs S3: To what extent this OP evaluation can inform the RIS3 mid-term review?
- OP vs S3: Are the OP evaluation questions sufficient to evaluate a RIS3? What is missing?
- Discuss the trade-off between overspecification and bidding on the price vs more degrees of freedom in proposing a methodology and bidding on price/performance.
- To conclude, what would you expect from those ToR?
- 16:00 – 16:30 - Reporting back + comments by Ken Guy
|
16:30 - 16:45 Closing remarks
Mark Boden (JRC): Conclusions from the day
Elisabetta Marinelli (JRC): Next steps
|